Day 66 — Numbers 30 – 31

We might be tempted to take offense that God would treat women differently than men regarding vows, granting men authority over women to annul their vows; but instead let’s seek to understand God. The first consideration would be, did He mean what I think He meant? In this case, it is difficult to miss the meaning because He is good enough to repeat it several times. It was almost as if He expected our incredulity! Since He was so clear about the regulation, let’s consider what He intended by it. To dismiss it as discriminatory against women is to consider our ways and thoughts higher than God’s ways and thoughts. Certainly I don’t claim to comprehend God’s higher ways and thoughts, but on contemplation I can perceive a couple of reasons that this rule makes sense.

Women were always under the protection of men in that culture, and from some of the cultural norms revealed in the books of the Law, we can understand that there was a good reason for that. Life could get difficult in a home where a headstrong daughter or wife had desires and ambitions contrary to those of her father and husband. God’s design for those relationships took care to avoid such strife by placing one party in submission to the other. Where they disagreed, He settled the argument by designating who settled the argument. A special problem might arise, however, when the party who was supposed to submit claimed that she couldn’t submit because a vow she had made to God would stand in the way. That could present a considerable source of strife in that home. His regulations about vows prevented that.

Another reason it might make sense that a women’s vows could be annulled by the man whose protection she enjoyed, was that women can sometimes be overcome by their fluctuating emotions, and do some rash things. I suppose there were many women who were grateful to be relieved of responsibility to fulfill rash vows.

So rather than take offense at God’s disparity in His treatment of women and men, let us seek to understand. Peaceful relations in the home were a higher priority to him than equal autonomy between men and women. Doesn’t that make sense? Our culture has taught us some different values. Are there adjustments you need to make in your values based on God’s revelation of His higher ways and thoughts?

God allowed them to take vengeance on Midian for the Baal worshiping incident that cost them 24,000 lives. He says that vengeance is His, and we are not to take vengeance, but in this case the vengeance He took was through the means of His people. How do we reconcile the fact that they killed every male, burned their cities, and killed even the women and “males among the little ones?” As God had pointed out to Abraham, the sin of these people had reached the point that He was ready to bring judgment on them, and the instrument He would use would be the Israelites. As He would point out repeatedly in Deuteronomy, if these people were allowed to remain, they would influence the Israelites and lead them astray; therefore they had to be totally removed. History shows that a few of them moved north to avoid the Israelite invasion and lived. Israel’s killing of every male, young and old, and the women, seems harsh, but it was a matter of their survival.

Rather than being offended by the killing as Satan would like us to be, let us adjust our vision to see how awful is that which is corrupted by sin. It is dangerous to us. The nature of sin is to grow, as we have seen happen leading up to Noah’s day and in the Canaanites. If we are offended at God’s way of dealing with sin, we have fallen into Satan’s deception. Instead, we must hate sin as God hates it. One of the reasons we should hate it is that it will be deadly to us if we don’t get rid of it. If instead we allow some to remain in our midst, in our selves, it will grow and bear fruit.

Notice the way God directed the distribution of the booty. After the soldiers shared half with the congregation and then gave from their portion to the Lord, they were so grateful for the miraculous preservation of their own lives that they were inspired to give yet more. How does that fit with your understanding of God’s desire for your giving?

Day 65 — Numbers 27 – 29

Among those “hordes” of people, God took serious consideration of the dilemma of Zelophehad’s name and inheritance. This account speaks to me about how important it was to Him that a family held on to its inheritance. Why would it be so important to God that a family maintain its possession of their portion of the Promised Land? It’s worth prayerful consideration.

Moses’ prayer for a leader to replace him made a difference for the nation of Israel. Joshua led the nation into the Promised Land and saw them settled. When it came time for him to say his farewell, however, he did not make the same request of God, and the result was disastrous. We’ll read about it in the book of Judges. These experiences remind us that we can’t take God or His provision for granted. We need to ask Him for what we need.

Imagine how intimidating it would be for any leader to follow Moses! Moses was rightly revered as a great leader; who could live up to his example? The people had threatened to turn back under Moses’ leadership many times; there was a real possibility that they would refuse to follow the new leader, who was going to be leading them into battle, no less. If they questioned Moses’ leadership, who could possibly fare better? God made provision for handing over leadership in such a way that the people would be inclined to accept Joshua, and they did. We must appreciate our God-given leaders for the precious gift they are, and support them.

This account of the required animal sacrifices reminds us that worship of God was expensive to God’s Old Covenant people. Their wealth was measured in these animals. Does our worship of God involve sacrifice? Further, the given remedy for sin required daily attention, and special attention throughout the year. Do we give it any less attention?

Day 64 — Numbers 25 – 26

Why would the people of Moab invite the Israelites to the sacrifices of their gods, when they saw them as threatening enemies? Look at the outcome: 24,000 people died in judgment, a number that would have made any military leader proud if he had killed them in battle. Numbers 31:16 reveals that they did it on the advice of Balaam.

Why would the Israelites accept such an invitation? They likely did not intend to abandon God. Some of their reasons likely included establishing peaceful relations with their new neighbors, and getting this potential power of Baal on their side. Both reasons were flawed, for God did not intend for them to have peace with Moab in that manner. Rather, His plan was just what He had already established, that their security would be the fear of Israel that He would put in the other nations’ hearts. He didn’t need the help of their humanly wise efforts to maintain their national security! And of course the power of Baal was nothing, since such a being was simply a figment of man’s imagination. We wonder how their choice could possibly have seemed wise to them, but once again we need to learn from them. Do we rely more heavily on man’s wisdom than on God’s in our own life choices and ways? Do we trust God to take care of us, or do we hedge our bets with building our own security as our culture teaches us to do?

Another reason the people accepted the Moabites’ invitation obviously was the lure of the temptation of sexual sin that was part of the worship of Baal. God called their worship of Baal “joining themselves to Baal.” His view, which is always true, is that alliance with the other god means total separation from the true God. If we think our intentions to split our devotion between God and any other person or thing make any difference, we are wrong. Further, we will fool ourselves if we think we can participate and overcome the temptation. Even if that is true, why would we risk so much?

The leaders had to kill those of their own men who “joined themselves to Baal.” Can you imagine, executing your own people? That is certainly harsh, harsher than our culture can accept. Aren’t you grateful that we are not called to judge our fellow believers? However, there are the directives for church discipline and resolving conflicts in the New Testament that seem harsh to us. Do we treat them as if God couldn’t really mean them?

After the death from the plague that resulted from their sin, they take another census, which verifies that all of the generation doomed to die in the wilderness were actually dead. We generally treasure the promises of God, but in this case, His keeping of His promise is a sobering reminder for us.

Day 63 — Numbers 22 – 24

Why this story about Balak and Balaam in all of its detail? Micah 6:5 records God’s reference of the incident to the people of Judah in the days of the security threat from Assyria. He tells them to remember it “in order that (they) might know the righteous acts of the Lord.”

It is difficult to know how to assess Balaam’s character, as we see qualities to admire, we see him cave to the king of Moab, and we see him end up blessing Israel, all without commentary from Scripture. II Peter 2:15 and Jude 11 give us the commentary we seek, and they evaluate his actions as one who has gone astray.

Balaam departed after blessing Israel, but he gave the king of Moab advice about another possible way to defeat “the horde” that was threatening to “lick them up.” You will read tomorrow about the attempt and its outcome, and it is later revealed that Balaam was behind it. I share this to point out that we don’t have all of the information we would like in this account. Having less detail than we desire may be a common frustration of reading Scripture, but don’t be sidetracked by the frustration and so give way to the enemy even one little bit. Rather, glean what you can from what you have been given, because God has given us what we need to know in this account and throughout Scripture. If He can speak to the dense Balaam through a donkey, He should be able to get through to us in what He has provided in His word. If He doesn’t, it isn’t because He is incapable of or unwilling to speak to us, but that we aren’t listening.

Why was God angry with Balaam for going, since He had instructed Balaam to go with the men? God had already commanded Balaam not to go with them; why would Balaam have to ask a second time? He obviously wasn’t fully committed to doing what God wanted. He wanted God to sanction his own plans to add to his prestige and profit. Perhaps God knew that he was going to give in to the temptation to do what the king of Moab wanted him to do, rather than doing what God wanted him to do, and was giving him a warning that would strengthen his interest in doing what God wanted him to do. God’s dealing with Balaam should give us confidence in Him with regard to our own affairs.

This was going on while Israel was camping peacefully on the plain. God used their enemy’s desire to curse them, to bless them, while they had no idea that this was happening. Might God be advocating for you and your protection while you are unaware?

The Spirit of God came upon Balaam as he intended to bless Israel. First God was angry enough to send His angel as Balaam’s adversary, then He came upon Balaam in Spirit form, then Balaam fell away. This is an example we’ve been given as a warning. He accepted God’s gracious reconciliation and sided fully with God, allowing himself to be used fully for God’s purpose in blessing the Israelites. Can you accept God’s forgiveness and seek to be used by Him? Balaam’s example also teaches us not to presume upon God’s grace or count on past victories to keep us from judgment if we sin.

What a powerful testimony, trading the lure of silver and gold for obedience to God’s command and conformance to His heart. But did he mean it? He pronounced the “oracle of Balaam” and not the oracle of God. His opening lines exalt Balaam and not God. Was he faithful to God or himself? He is a confusing guy, much as we are if we are not sanctified of our “double-mindedness,” as James calls it.

The account ends with Balaam returning home, but that wasn’t the end of his involvement in this story.

Day 62 — Numbers 19 – 21

The water for purification (yawn!) had no practical value, only ceremonial, and only for one purpose – for purification after one had contact with, even as superficial as being in the presence of, a dead person. This required a lot of effort: the preparation of the ashes, involving several people, each of whom had to wash themselves and their clothes after performing their duties (think about washing those big woolen robes by hand – that was no easy task!), seems like a ridiculous amount of work for ceremonial cleansing from simple contact with death, an experience that would occur so frequently in a population the size of Israel. Why? The requirement speaks to me of the awfulness of death. Another indication of the awfulness is the amount of time involved to make one clean after contacting or even being in the same tent as a human corpse: in case you missed it, that was seven days. The water for purification had to be sprinkled twice in that time period, once at the halfway point, and once at the end; and failure to do so resulted in that person being excluded from community worship. This is serious business! If they were excluded from the assembly, they were excluded from the proper worship of those holy days requiring assembly – and that required expulsion from the community.

Let us recognize that death is an awful thing. Even though God imposed it as a consequence of sin, He hates it. We see it as a natural part of life, but it isn’t God’s plan for His creation. Think about it – He created with excellence, repeatedly evaluating His creations as good. How offensive, then, it must be to Him to see that creation deteriorate with age, and die. Much more so when it is a person in whom He invests much because He seeks relationship with him. When we suffer the pain of a dear one’s death, or when we face a scary diagnosis, we realize that death is not natural, but horrible. I appreciate that God here elevates its unique awfulness with these unique and inconvenient requirements. Does that appraisal offer balm for your soul?

The people still had not learned to ask God for what they needed, when He was there for the very purpose of providing for them! Instead, they grumbled – again – , shifted blame for their dead-ending in the wilderness, and looked back longingly to the land of their enslavement. Is God wanting to use them as a mirror for you today? “Search me, O God,” and don’t let me be like them! Transform me so that I am not like them.

Moses’ sin of striking the rock instead of speaking to it seems mild compared to the peoples’ sin, especially since God seems rather patient with the people. Add to that the mitigating factors of Moses’ age, the amount of times he had been down this same road with the griping Israelites, his weariness of wilderness living, God’s command to take the rod, and the fact that the rod had been used in the past and he was probably operating out of habit. So why the harsh punishment for Moses and Aaron?

There may be more reasons than are evident to us, but let us learn from what evidence we do have. They as leaders had failed to obey, had failed to believe God, and had failed to treat God as holy in the sight of the people. Leaders are held to a higher standard.

But look at what their words would have implied to the people: that they were the ones who brought water from the rock. Their job as leaders was to point people to God; instead they were elevating themselves. Leadership is a serious responsibility. We should accept that responsibility with care. We must be praying for our leaders, that they wouldn’t have a Moses moment in the stress of their duties. We had better not be pushing them over the edge as the people did to Moses!

Today’s reading finds the Israelites on the move toward the Promised Land. Hopefully they have used their time in the wilderness to prepare for taking the land. The Canaanite king’s attack would have almost been a blessing as a thrust into war, a victory, and a first taste of battle and what God intended them to do in order to displace the inhabitants of the land. Can we see some of our skirmishes with the enemy in the same light, as actions that incite us to battle, giving God a chance to gain us victory?

Why would God give Moses instruction to raise up a bronze serpent on a pole as the antidote to the serpents’ fatal poison? God had never done anything like that before, and didn’t again. Sometimes He does startlingly unexpected things; we will never have Him figured out! I believe that His mercy to these undeserving people was in large part a lesson to us of Messiah. Understanding fallen human nature, God knows that simple faith is difficult for us to grasp, and so He gave us this object lesson. These ungrateful and perpetually grumbling people did not deserve the relief from punishment; God, however, mercifully gave it. They didn’t have to do anything elaborate or painful to earn the salvation; they simply had to look. Looking on the serpent was almost ridiculous, and ridiculously simple, given the crisis they were suffering. To look was to exercise faith in the salvation God had given. Those who looked, lived. So it is with our salvation: we do nothing to earn it. It is given by God, and we simply go to Him for our salvation.

 

Day 61 — Numbers 16 – 18

Imagine what it must have been like for humble Moses to be confronted by 250 leading men of the people. These weren’t rabble, but “men of renown.” Apparently they may have had in mind to lead the nation into the Promised Land on their own initiative, or worse yet, lead them back to Egypt rather than languish in the wilderness until they all died. God did not bow to the will of the majority then, and He doesn’t now. It may sound harsh to us, but recalling that He is all-knowing and good, it is actually a blessing. Do we see it as such in our churches, or do we think we know better than our God-given leaders?

Can you believe how ridiculous the attitudes of the people were? They blamed Moses for their going nowhere and for the denial of their inheritance that they suffered. They forgot that Egypt was the place of their enslavement and called it a “land of milk and honey,” obviously wanting to go back. Even after the dramatic assertion of God’s choice of leader, the people grumbled against Moses for the death of the problem people – the very next day! They still refused to submit to God in His choice of leader and their having to serve time in the wilderness. This story is an occasion for us to remember our own fallen tendencies,  ask God to search us for these kinds of behaviors and attitudes, and correct them.

The people died for their grumbling, and what were they doing at the end of chapter 17 – grumbling about being killed by God for their grumbling? That isn’t quite clear to me. What is clear is that God does not like grumbling. That seems to be an understatement given the harsh consequences He imposed on these people for their grumbling. Do we get that lesson? God does not like grumbling in me anymore than He liked grumbling in them, since Scripture teaches that He never changes.

Does that mean that He is not open to our requests when we are suffering in our circumstances? That’s part of the power of the psalm we read yesterday. The man of God would certainly be able to show us what a properly God-honoring response is, and Moses did so in Psalm 90. It might bear another review to solidify the lessons it can teach us, given that God does not like grumbling.

The numbers are being picked off….

Aaron’s rod didn’t just bud as a sign of God’s selection; it blossomed and bore fruit. God wanted His selection to be clear. This account teaches us that He does want to communicate to His people what is important for them to know, and He can communicate with them with absolute effectiveness. Do you suppose that He wants and is able to communicate as effectively to us today? He doesn’t often do so with miracles, but if we expect Him to give us the information we need, and seek for it, we will find it. It is often embarrassingly obvious once we realize how He communicates. I believe that He doesn’t often give us miraculous revelations today, because He has given us what we need to know in Scripture. The key is to know what Scripture says and make its application to our own lives properly. The only way to know what it says is to be in it daily, as we are doing. Then when a situation arises in which we need God’s insight or guidance, we can rightly ask the Holy Spirit to remind us of what we need to understand.

 

Day 60 — Numbers 14 – 15, Psalm 90

God was angry with them because of their lack of faith in Him. Faith, or their lack of faith, was a choice here. They chose poorly. Do you see faith as a choice? Faith isn’t a feeling of belief; rather it is a choice to believe when the feeling is not there. It is exercising trust. If God was angry with His Old Covenant people for not exercising faith in Him, does He get angry with His New Covenant people for the same? Is He angry with you today?

Observe Moses’ approach in interceding for the people. We can learn from it how to pray more effectively. What steps can you list that he took, and how can you apply each one to your praying for others?

Caleb and Joshua didn’t contribute to the bad report, and indeed, presented a totally different picture of the land and encouraged the people to trust in God to bring them into it; they would be rewarded for that faith and faithfulness. However, they also had to wait forty years with the rest of the congregation. What does this example of God’s dealing in men’s affairs speak to you about His dealing in your affairs? Isn’t it frightening to think that worthy people, our own dear ones, might suffer unjustly because of our choices? Thank God for this compelling reminder, which is powerful encouragement to us to make better choices.

Verses 14:28-35 are key verses in the book of Numbers. The book began with a census. God promised that every man numbered in that census, those aged twenty years old and older, would die in the wilderness and not see the Promised Land. So the book is really a story about God’s faithfulness to this sad promise.

The people acknowledged that they had sinned, but rejected the consequences of their sin. They did not have the same attitude toward their sin that God had. This is far from the response that God accepts. The sinner who humbles himself before God, seeking forgiveness, intending to forsake the sin, is the one to whom God responds. His plan is that man be saved from sin, not simply acknowledge it. Their refusal to accept the consequences of their sin was the polar opposite of the humble response God would accept. What does this speak to you about your own response to sin?

Their further actions can be instructive as an object lesson for our own actions. They attempted to take possession of the Promised Land contrary to God’s plan and without God’s presence (and thus, His help). Do we try to circumvent God’s plan for our salvation and try to enjoy His promises without His help? Remembering that God’s Old Testament people are showcases for fallen human nature, we must take this story as an opportunity to search our own lives and hearts for the same responses they made, and the attitudes that those responses reveal.

So the nation of Israel was doomed to spend forty years in the wilderness. The entire generation of complainers and grumblers would die in that time and never see the Promised Land. This delayed God’s plan for that time,and  didn’t look glorious to that generation of onlookers; nevertheless, He kept them in the wilderness, outside the Promised Land for the full forty years. Isn’t that sad? Eating manna when they could have been enjoying those grapes. Surrounded by gray and brown when they could have been enjoying the green that produces milk and honey. The wilderness becomes an object lesson for us, an object lesson of living outside of God’s promises to us. You’re not doing that, are you?

God used the sad time in the wilderness for good. One good thing that came from it is that Moses used the time to write the first five books of the Bible. God also used the time to instruct them further in His desire for them. What He adds here to the Law is simply giving them the highlights, a broader perspective of what He wants, so that they understand His heart. Some of the highlights:

  • They don’t decide what the payment for sin is; God does. Bringing the offering as God specified demonstrated confession (seeing one’s sin as God sees it) and humility before Him.
  • He provided a way for them to pay for unintentional sin, but the one who sinned intentionally and deliberately was to be cut off from his people. There was no remedy for such sin.
  • He really does intend that the Sabbath be a day of complete rest for them! Punishment of death seems harsh, but it would mean that the people would do this thing that was obviously very important to God.
  • Tassels on their garments were important? No, remembrance is. Remembrance that would cause them to obey God’s commands and so be holy to God, rather than “follow after (their) own hearts and (their) own eyes”. Remembrance would cause them to see God for Who He is.

Moses also used his time in the wilderness to dabble in some poetry. Psalm 90 is all the more powerful to me when put into the context of the writer’s circumstances. It is his testimony of finding God even in the sentence of wasting a generation’s worth of time in the wilderness. A brief review of the Psalm teaches how he did so: praising God, acknowledging God’s sovereignty and submitting to it, reflecting on a realistic perspective of life, seeking for God to bring good through the suffering of life so that in the end His people have gained what is truly of value, and asking God for His good graces. What of those speaks most profoundly to you?

He is right in saying that they have been consumed by God’s anger – that is literally, as well as figuratively, true! Yet he seeks to be satisfied with God’s lovingkindness, that they “may sing for joy and be glad all (their) days (verse 14).” Lovingkindness from a God whose anger has consumed them? Satisfaction in that lovingkindness, instead of resentment for dear ones being consumed by the anger, instead of resentment for consuming hope for a life in a land of milk and honey with a sentence of a life wasted in the wilderness? Really? Expectation of joy in that circumstance? Gladness when dying in the wilderness is all they have to look forward to in this life, or for half of them, languishing in the wilderness for a full generation because of sins they didn’t commit? These are worth pondering.

Day 59 — Numbers 11 – 13

A year without meat does sound rough. But God was meeting their needs with the manna – a miraculous, abundant provision from God in the middle of the desert, on top of the miracles He had performed on their behalf leading them out of slavery. So who needs meat in light of that?!

Their desire for meat should have made them eager to enter The Promised Land and all the good abundance God had for them there. Instead, they looked back. Their behavior seems appalling to us, but do we do the same? There is much to consider here about God’s provision for our needs and about our response to His provision.

What if, instead of complaining against God when they wanted meat, they had asked Him for meat? He seemed willing to give it to them. We are instructed throughout the New Testament to ask God for our needs. Do we do any better than God’s Old Testament people did in asking Him for our needs? Complaining does terrible things in us and for us.

The people’s complaints pushed Moses over the edge. When God’s anger burned against the people in the past, Moses had interceded for them; now He complained to God about their being a hardship. Why did God not get angry at Moses for his complaints? Can you discern the difference, and learn from it? There is a hint in verse 11:34.

At some point Moses had been given God’s Spirit, the same Holy Spirit Who lives in us. That Spirit didn’t keep him from getting fed up with the people and the burdens of his responsibility for them when they complained. Can you blame him? Might our own Spirit-led leaders grow weary of us? Might the Spirit grow weary of us? If Moses can be pushed over the edge with the people’s complaints, can our leaders, as well? God, make us intercessors for and encouragers of our leaders, not complainers!

That Spirit’s indwelling did produce visible evidence of His presence in them. Do we exhibit the same? Should we?

Why did Miriam and Aaron complain about Moses’ wife? That obviously wasn’t their real gripe; it was an excuse to elevate themselves over him and perhaps not to submit to his leadership. God’s intervention was a dramatic and probably unforgettable lesson to them, and should have been to the entire nation. His defense of Moses was a defense of His own leadership, as Moses was the leader He chose for the work of leading the people out of Egypt and making them a nation under Him. Moses was His instrument, and failure to submit to his leadership was a failure to submit to God’s leadership. In fact, in verses 17:5 and 17:10 God equates their grumbling against His chosen leader with grumbling against Him.

Is it any different with the leaders God gives us today? Do we anger God when we fail to respect and follow the leaders He gives us? Even though Moses’ humility apparently made him not very leader-like in the people’s eyes, he was nevertheless God’s chosen leader. Does this speak to you about the importance of God’s given leaders in your life, and God’s desire for your “follow-ship”?

The leaders sent to check out the land saw impressive things that should have made them eager to take God up on His promise to give them the land, but they shared with the people only the obstacles they saw. This offers further commentary on leadership. These men lacked faith in God and proper vision, both necessary for leaders of God’s people in a fallen world. How important the choice of leader is! Character qualities of a leader certainly do matter. Does this help you appreciate what a gift a God-given leader is, and give you greater understanding of their need for your prayer support and encouragement?

Day 58 — Numbers 8 – 10

That God would tell Aaron how to mount the lamps in the lamp stand reminds me that no detail of our work or worship is too small for His care if we take it to Him. Being a detail-oriented person myself, I appreciate that about God. Do you see revelations about God Himself in the instructions He gives for worship, that make you love Him more?

Once again we see those whom God had called into service requiring preparation for service. We can’t expect to jump into service without preparation when we are called by God. Further, He knows the preparation that is needed. In this case, in order for the Levites to serve in the tabernacle as a substitute for the firstborn of the nation, they had to be separated, they had to purify themselves, they had to be cleansed, atonement had to be made for their sin, and they were presented before the Lord in a ceremony. Do any of those steps speak to you about your own preparation to serve God?

The value of the rituals is lost on us, in our informal culture, but they had their value as marking a starting point of something new, the beginning of important institutions. We don’t observe many rituals today; do you suppose there is any correlation in our culture between our lack of formal rituals and our careless attitudes towards our obligations? I wonder if we could benefit by observing more rituals?

Provision had to be made for people affected by the messiness of life to observe the Passover. They couldn’t observe it in an unclean state, and they couldn’t fail to observe it, at pain of being cut off from among God’s people. Do these seem like harsh requirements? They teach us that God has standards for His people. If He had standards for His Old Testament people, do you suppose that He has standards for His New Testament people? He died to save us from sin, and we are expected to live saved from sin. Although we aren’t told at what point New Testament followers are cut off, we would be foolish to fail to conform to His standards and then find out on the day we come face to face with Jesus that He never knew us.

After the interlude of the making of the covenant, giving of the Law, building the Tabernacle and its furnishings, and institution of worship in the Tabernacle, the Israelites were ready to move on. They were no longer a nation of slaves; the year-long interlude had transformed them into an independent people, God’s people. One year, one month and twenty days had elapsed since they left Egypt; now they were ready to move forward into the land God has promised them – The Promised Land.

Day 57 — Numbers 7

Every tribe gave the same gifts for the dedication of the altar, and God instructed that each tribe’s leader was to present his tribe’s offering on a different day. That’s twelve more days that they remained in camp, making no progress toward the Promised Land. Why twelve days? The animal sacrifices presented each day would have been burning in a twelve-day dedication observance. The dedication of the altar, which meant implementation of the regular worship practices God prescribed in the Law, was important and worthy of a lengthy observance. The time implies that they would have had time to reflect as well as celebrate. That speaks to me that perhaps we could benefit from some time to celebrate and reflect in observance of milestones in our relationships with God. We rush through life, generally looking ahead so that we fail to appreciate what God is doing now, often missing it completely.

I also appreciate the fact that although each tribe gave the same gift, each tribe’s gift gets its own day and its full description. That may make dull reading for us, but it indicates that each gift was worthy. That speaks to me of how God deems my own seemingly feeble gifts. When I think of Him not only noticing but treasuring my gifts, lost as they may seem, piled up with so many other gifts (many of which seem more impressive than mine), I feel treasured myself.

Moses now met with God in the tent they had built for a mobile version of a temple. Think about it: God spoke audibly to Moses from the top of the Ark of the Covenant. That meant that He was really there, just behind that curtain. That’s the first time God had lived in the midst of man since Adam and Eve. What a privilege!

Consider the privilege it is to have God in us.