Day 19 -– Genesis 25 – 26

Can you imagine how difficult it must have been for Abraham to send away his sons? Modern day relations in the Middle East teach us how important that was; for these non-covenant sons, spread over the Middle East, are probably the ancestors of many of Israel’s most hateful enemies today.

In our politically correct culture, sending them away seems unacceptably harsh. God could have provided for Isaac’s wealth just as He did Abraham’s, and He in fact did (reference verses 26:12-14 and 28-29); so why did these sons need to go? The possession of the land was clearly intended for Isaac’s descendants, and no others. Isaac was not powerful enough in numbers to actually possess it in his lifetime, but Abraham didn’t want to risk Isaac’s full possession in the future by allowing his other sons to share in the possession of it now until Isaac’s descendants grew powerful enough to take full possession. Rather, he took clear action to make it understood that his other sons were not to share in the possession of it.

Abraham’s hard stand reminds me of Jesus’ teaching that anyone who doesn’t hate father, brothers, etc. isn’t fit for the kingdom of God. Abraham demonstrated that in his sending away his sons for the sake of the covenant (which of course delayed his own possession of the land). The translation of the word “hate” aside, God really does require at times that relationship with Him necessitates some difficult sacrifices for us. Of course Abraham didn’t hate his sons. His actions show how critical it was for the covenant to preserve Isaac’s interest in the land and terminate the interest of all other potential possessors. To fail to exclude the others would be to despise the covenant. What lessons does God have for your life in this example?

One lesson that occurs to me is that God’s covenant is not all-inclusive. While He loves all He has created, He doesn’t enjoy relationship with all. It is a privilege to enjoy relationship with God. Do we treasure it as it merits? This is a good reminder to thank God now for the privilege of having a relationship with Him.

The promises God made to Abraham were to be through Isaac, and Isaac’s wife, the wife God clearly intended for him and orchestrated the connection with  so beautifully, was infertile. God was clearly in control of this matter, for all it took to correct it was Isaac’s praying for his wife. Would Isaac have prayed to God at all, if not for this very important need? God made the promises, but their fulfillment didn’t come automatically. What can this teach us about God’s promises to us? What application does this have for your life?

When the infertility problem was corrected, what followed was perpetual struggle in the family. The working out of God’s promises is not always smooth. If we expect it to be, we are deceived, and this gives the enemy an opportunity to discourage us.

Isaac’s relationship with Abimelech gives us an idea of what it meant that Isaac was a sojourner in the land, as opposed to a possessor. We, too, are sojourners in this world. Do we live as such, or are we striving to take possession, make ourselves comfortable and secure? The life of a sojourner is a life of faith in God’s provision and protection.

Until God appeared to Isaac at Beersheba, He was known to Isaac as “the God of your father Abraham.” After that, He was known personally to Isaac, so that in tomorrow’s reading when God introduces Himself to Jacob, He does so as “the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac.” Obviously, something happened at Beersheba to advance the relationship between God and Isaac; building the altar and calling on God’s name were not simply motions Isaac went through. We should all be able to testify about transformational Beershebas in our walks with God.

Day 18 -– Genesis 22 – 24

Some readers believe Abraham knew God wouldn’t actually require him to sacrifice his son; one can only suppose. Imagine – take the time to consider what Abraham went through. God does some startling things, and asks of us some startling things, and His ways are higher than our ways. This was the kind of test that not only showed what was in Abraham’s reverence for God, but also grew it. Abraham exercised his choice to obey God at cost of not only his beloved son but also the promises God had given him through Isaac, and the choice he made doubtless grew his love for God. That is sort of a reversal of Adam and Eve’s choice to eat the fruit forbidden to them. Abraham responded to his test in the way God had hoped Adam and Eve would respond to their test. God, prepare us to respond like Abrahams and not Adams when You present us with a testing and proving opportunity. Can you spend some devotional time praying for that today?

Chapter 23 may not be important to us, but it would have been to the Israelites for whom the book was written. It reminded them that Abraham was well-respected in the land they were about to take possession of. The Canaanites of that day welcomed him into their midst, to the point of offering to give him land at no cost; however, Abraham paid full price for it, and it was formally and legally deeded to him in full sight and approval of the elders of the people who lived there. Formal burial of one’s dead was a mark of habitation; everyone understood the tie to the land that resulted from it. 

God’s provision of Rebekah for Isaac is a lovely story of God’s working out the details of man’s affairs in accordance with His will, to fulfill His purpose, and in such a way to delight His people. Do you suppose God delighted in delighting Abraham’s servant and Isaac? Do you suppose He delights in delighting us? In delighting you? Can you imagine Him working in your affairs in such lovely fashion? What lessons does this story have for you?

One thing that speaks to me is Isaac’s waiting on God. Chapter 25 tells us that he was forty years old when Rebekah became his wife. Apparently she was worth waiting for, for from that impersonal selection process came a match that obviously pleased Isaac. God doesn’t always bring us good in our timing, and sometimes the enjoyment of good is delayed by other things that are necessary.

Another point from Isaac’s story is that he didn’t take the easy route. Abraham set high standards for the choice of Isaac’s mate, standards not easily met. Can you imagine being given the assignment Abraham’s servant was given? It must have seemed impossible. How often do high standards get that very response in our experience? If God gives the standards, He can see that the one who adheres to them meets them. This is no promise, but it is the example we have been given in Abraham and Isaac.

The servant sought God’s help in carrying out his charge.  He didn’t expect to get help from God in the form of an audible instruction, any more than we can expect that. He knew God’s provision by the fulfillment of the arrangements he had made with God ahead of time. Then when God worked according to his arrangement, he recognized God in it and gave Him due praise. Is that a step we tend to omit when circumstances work out well for us? Do we rejoice in the circumstances and the way they worked out, but forget that God was in them, and neglect to give Him thanks and praise? For what can you praise God today that you have failed to do so in the past? Can you commit to Him today to wait on Him to work out the circumstances that tempt you to take matters into your own hands?

Day 17 -– Genesis 19 – 21

What lessons can you glean from Lot’s choices? When we first met him, he was so prosperous that the land couldn’t support both his wealth of livestock and Abraham’s. He chose the place of apparent abundance; so what happened? Can you imagine a more ignominious end? What can you learn about God from this account? Is He more just, or more merciful? How do these truths about God impact you?

Abraham was obviously not perfect, and didn’t master a bent toward lying for his own protection, even as he enjoyed more relationship with God and reinforcement of His promises. He needed inner transformation for that. (Do you see how desperately man needs the promised Messiah?) As in the same incidence in Egypt, Abraham needed Sarah’s cooperation to pull off the lie. This man of God put his wife (and thus God’s wonderful promises to him) in jeopardy, for his own safety, sought his wife’s cooperation in doing so, and received her cooperation! It seems senseless. Is it any less sensible than our own choices? Is there a choice confronting you today, to live in God’s promise or take matters into your own hands? What are you going to do about it?

Nevertheless, God “did for Sarah as He had promised,” and Isaac was born after they had waited about 25 years after God’s call and initial promise. Imagine what they had been through in that time, with only infrequent words from God to sustain their hope as hope must doubtless have grown dimmer with their aging. Why would God have waited so long? To strengthen not only Abraham and Sarah’s faith, but the faith of Isaac as he also lived as a sojourner in a lawless land? To strengthen the faith of Moses’ readers, the nation of Israel, in the process of being transformed from a nation of slaves to a nation of warriors? To strengthen our faith in God? “For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance and encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.” (1Corinthians 10:11-12)

Where do you need to be strengthened in your faith in God today? Will you choose now to renew your faith in Him in this circumstance?

Day 16 -– Genesis 16 – 18

Abram and Sarai take matters into their own hands, giving up on God’s fulfilling His promise to Abram. Admittedly, they had waited ten years for God to fulfill the promise of offspring; that’s a long time to wait, especially with Sarai’s biological clock doubtlessly ticking like a time bomb and then chiming a death knell. But God…!

What parallels to the account of Adam and Eve’s sin do you notice in Genesis 16? What lessons can they teach you or remind you about your own weaknesses and how they impact your marriage? (Are these two accounts too few to note a pattern in women getting so carried away by their feelings that they badger their husbands into doing something their husbands wouldn’t otherwise do? And to see a pattern in husbands giving up their roles as leaders and giving in to their wives contrary to God’s word?) Women might be wise to use Eve and Sarai as warnings, that we may have a tendency to lack self-control over our feelings, may tend to badger our husbands, driving them to take regrettable action. Examine yourself, Girls! Men might be wise to take warning from Adam’s and Abram’s examples of failing in their leadership roles and caving under pressure from their wives. Perhaps this is why God established the hierarchy in marriage that He did, that “wives (be) subject to their husbands”, so that this pattern doesn’t repeat.

What lessons can you learn or reminders can you note about taking control in matters that are for God to work out? Is there something in your life that you need to choose to wait on God to work out? Make that choice now!

Chapter 17 is an important continuation of the establishment of the covenant between God and Abram. God tells Abram the conditions He places on the promises He has made to Abram. Note what the conditions are (to walk before God and be blameless, and circumcision) and what God promises (Abram will become the father of a multitude of nations, and the land of Canaan will everlastingly belong to Abram’s descendants). The promise is so firm that God changes Abram’s name to Abraham, meaning “father of a multitude,” and Sarai’s name to Sarah, meaning “princess.” The name change is significant because in that culture names were closely linked to a person’s character. One’s name is a vital part of one’s identity.

Note in today’s reading that God is identified by two different names: to Hagar He was “the God who sees.” He introduced Himself to Abram as “God Almighty.” Consider what His names, and the fact that He has numerous names, mean. He is so big, so much, that He is not confined to one name. To Hagar and Abram, He was what they needed.

Abraham laughed at God’s promise to give him a son through Sarah, which any of us should be able to understand because by now he was 99 years old, and Sarah was 89, and they had waited 25 years for God to fulfill His promise of a son! But Abraham was, after all, talking to God Almighty.

Abraham may have laughed, which seems out of character for one whose faith in God had earlier been credited to him as righteousness. But don’t look down on him too far, because he did immediately submit to circumcision himself and go circumcise his household, instituting it for his household thereafter.

How are you doing in your reading? If you have been doing so faithfully, you are well on your way toward having a habit established. If you haven’t been so faithful, there is time to work on it – keep working at it! I am praying for you to succeed.

Day 15- – Genesis 11:27 through chapter 15

Note how Abram’s relationship with God grows throughout these chapters. What parallels can you apply to your own life?

Consider what Abram’s obedience to God meant, and understand. Although we know Abram as a spiritual giant, he was not so when he first obeyed God. At best, God was probably known to him as the God of his father, for in Genesis 31:53 Terah’s descendants knew God as “the God of Abraham and the God of Nahor, and the God of their father.” It was not until he reached the heart of the Promised Land, Bethel, that Abram “called upon the name of the Lord,” according to verse 12:8. Based on what history tells us about his home and some hints from events in the lives of Terah’s descendants (refer to Genesis 31:19), we can assume that Abram observed at least in part the worship practices of his culture of origin in Ur: he worshipped many false gods, of whom God Almighty was not one. He enjoyed relative luxury living in Ur, a great city with all the comforts civilization had to offer. He traded all that for a promise from an unknown God and life in tents as a sojourner living in a place he didn’t belong, in an age where might made right. What a foolish move! God’s people today often hear the same from the culture around them.

Abram was not a saint, as the detour to Egypt shows. Egypt (the greatest civilization in the known world in Abram’s day) became a problem for Abram and his descendants. It represented to them the best man’s efforts had to offer in the way of security and luxury. It symbolizes life outside of the land of promise, living not by faith in God but by faith in man. We should be able to identify with that today, for our culture offers us the same temptation that Egypt was to God’s chosen people of that day.

Isn’t it interesting that God demonstrated a greater ability to take care of Abram than Abram’s ability to take care of himself? Hopefully this strengthens our faith in God’s ability to take care of us, so that we’re less inclined to rely on our own efforts or run to the security our culture offers us in times of trial. Abram’s own efforts to protect himself were not lovely, were they? Are our efforts any lovelier? The exercise of faith is what made Abram a hero.

Chapter 15 makes little sense to us, but it is a very important chapter in the Bible. The chapter tells about the covenant God made with Abram. Covenant isn’t something with which we are very familiar, so it bears some explanation. A covenant is a promise. What is special about a covenant is that both parties make a promise, which means each party receives a promise. The most common example of covenants made today is marriage vows.

Remember, God had already made promises to Abram when He called him to move to Canaan. In chapter 12 He promised Abram that He would make his name great, and that He would make Abram a blessing to all the families on earth. In chapter 13 He promised to give to Abram and to his descendents forever the land on which he was standing, and that He would make Abram’s descendents innumerable. In chapter 15, make note of the promises God made to Abram. Consider what you know about God’s fulfillment of those promises. Has God been faithful to Abram?

When God gives Abram the vision, Abram sort of lets God off the hook, because it’s obvious that Abram isn’t going to father any children. Do you ever find yourself doing that? God insisted that Abram’s plan for working out God’s promise to him wasn’t what God intended at all, and of course God’s intention was much higher than Abram’s expectation. Let Abram serve as a reminder to us that God’s ways are indeed higher than our ways, and we don’t have to let God off the hook with regard to His promises. He is able to fulfill them in ways beyond what we could imagine!

Verse six tells us that Abram believed God, and God acknowledged that. Then in verse eight, Abram asks how he can know that God will fulfill His promise to him. So did Abram truly believe God, or not? Jesus encountered a similar situation in the man to whom He promised a miracle of casting out an unclean spirit, if the man would believe. The man’s response was “Lord I believe; help my unbelief!” Can you relate to that? Faith must start out with a choice to believe. If I insist on having proof in order to trust in a promise, my resulting belief isn’t faith; rather, it’s sight. It doesn’t take faith to believe in something you can see. So faith must start out with a choice to believe. Sometimes that choice feels like a great leap. In those times, faith may not feel real, because we may not be truly convinced. Does that make such faith less real? Not at all; in fact, it may be more real, because such faith truly exercises faith! The young man receiving Jesus’ promise, and Abram in Genesis 15 were both choosing to put their trust in God, and then asking for His help in feeling convinced. That is how faith works.

Did God get angry with Abram for asking for help to believe, after having acknowledged Abram’s belief, and even crediting it to him as righteousness? No! The animals he was instructed to bring to God were not punishment. Rather, they were to solemnize God’s promise. It was God’s giving His most solemn word to Abram in this matter. This covenant ceremony was very meaningful to Abram. In his culture, agreements were not formalized by writing them down and signing the contract, as ours are today. They were formalized in a covenant ceremony much like this one. They laid out animals like God instructed Abram to do, and both parties passed between the halves of the animals, conveying their solemn acknowledgement that if they didn’t keep the promise they were making, the same would happen to them as what they had done to the animals. That’s what the flaming torch meant: God was passing between the animal parts laid out on the ground, showing His sincerity in keeping His promises to Abram. He promised that if what He had promised was not fulfilled, He would be broken, His blood shed, like these animals. This was very moving to Abram. What a gift from God! Will God help us in our unbelief if we choose to place our trust in Him? Yes! Hebrews 11:6 says He rewards those who diligently seek Him in faith.

Notice that Abram didn’t make a promise, and didn’t pass between the pieces of animals. Was God not interested in Abram’s part of this covenant? It seems like Abram’s belief was a small thing for God to receive in this bargain. Was He offering Abram relationship with Him cheaply? More about the covenant between God and Abram is in tomorrow’s reading.

By the way, did God ever have to be broken, did He ever have to shed His blood because His promises were not fulfilled? The promises were obviously fulfilled, and yet God was broken…. More about that in the Gospels.

Day 3 -– Genesis 10:1 – 11:9; Job 1-3

We are not jumping around randomly with our diversion to the book of Job. The best scholarship has determined that Job lived before Abram, so that’s where we’re going to read about him.

The book of Job is not placed in its chronological spot in the Bible, because it is not a history book as Genesis through Esther are. That doesn’t mean that its history is not historically accurate. The Bible’s history has been proven accurate by cross references with man’s historical accounts and by archaeology time and again. The accuracy of the Bible’s history accounts began to be questioned by man in the nineteenth century, as scholars of literature began studying the Bible as a piece of literature. That was occurring at the same time that the science of archaeology was beginning, and had yet to dig up much that would shed light on the questions of historicity of the Bible. These scholars questioned the accuracy of the Bible’s history because it told of people and places for which no other historical references existed. These so-called scholars then concluded that this history which was not corroborated by man’s accounts was false. Then archeologists began uncovering historical records that verified time and again the history recorded in the Bible. Archaeologists found cities that had been buried so long that they were forgotten, except by the Bible. We need to accept the truth of the Bible apart from man’s corroboration, but isn’t it rewarding to be given answers to the skeptics’ doubts? We need to be careful that we aren’t persuaded by man’s so-called wisdom to doubt the truth of God’s word. Man’s wisdom is as limited as his knowledge of history was, as the evidence lay buried and long-forgotten. There is still much that lies buried; the absence of the evidence should not diminish our faith. God rewards us when we come to Him in faith.

Job’s story has offered much comfort to suffering people throughout history. How good God is to give us this story, and the glimpse into events behind it that we could never witness otherwise. Although the book is primarily poetry, we don’t need to doubt the historical existence of Job and the fact of his suffering. Has anyone suffered like Job? If he can endure faithfully in suffering, so can we. Some things to note about Job:

He was, in God’s words, “a blameless and upright man, fearing God and turning away from evil” (v. 1:8). God even reiterates that assessment of Job’s character in v. 2:3. It is important to remember throughout the book that Job is blameless in God’s sight. He remains blameless through the end of the book, which is also important to remember.

His first response was to bow to God’s sovereignty. Wow. What a model for us to follow when we are struck by catastrophe. His response to loss wasn’t due to his lack of care for what he lost. Rather, the background the book gives us tells us that Job cared for his children deeply. In the midst of that kind of pain, he submitted to God. He did not raise a fist to God’s face in rebellion. Lord, prepare each of us to respond to our own tragedies as did this lovely model You have given us.

He grieved. He was suffering cruelly, and he didn’t bottle it in!

He was suffering cruelly. Satan had no trouble with Job’s suffering; he simply wanted to use Job any way he could against God. Satan cares about you and me the same way. Understand what kind of enemy he is. He really doesn’t care about us; no, his passionate hatred is for God. We are merely the tools he uses to try to thwart God, and he picks us up and uses us any hurtful way he can, to hurt God. He wants to devour us, ruin us, hurt us – all in service to his hatred for God.

Satan could do nothing without God’s permission. Does that make God equally cruel, to allow Satan to harm Job? Hannah Whitall Smith used the picture of those hurtful trials coming from Satan through God’s hand: He stops some things, allows others. Why? Ultimately, only God knows, but we can submit to Him because His ways are higher than our ways (Is. 55:9) and because He is good. Anything He allows to come to us, He wants to use for our good (Romans 8:28). What good came to Job? Read the book, and see. One good thing that has come from Job’s story is that my soul has been fortified in the midst of my own suffering, by his example, as have countless other souls through the ages. The understanding and model this book gives us has proven to be a great help to God’s people.

Chapter 3 introduces us to ancient Hebrew poetry, of which few of us are fans. More about ancient poetry tomorrow.

Day 2 – Genesis 5 – 9

Did the flood really take place? There is much evidence for it in creation. That other cultures recorded flood accounts in their ancient mythologies well before Moses wrote Genesis is not evidence that the Bible copied its story of a world-wide flood from other sources. Man had been sharing oral accounts of this amazing event for generations. That someone wrote it down before Moses did does not diminish the authenticity of Moses’ account. Again, if we want accurate information, we need to consult the only available eyewitness to the flood.

God brought the flood to wipe out mankind and start over again with his finest specimen, because man was so evil that God regretted creating him. That fine specimen, Noah, had his faults, too, and even after performing so well in building the ark and getting into it, he blew it. How many times was God going to have to wipe out mankind and start over before man would get it right? Well, God had just better have a better plan than that. In fact, He did have a most amazing plan, one that would be incredible! Hint: reference Isaiah 9:6, Luke 1:35, Luke 2:10-12, and Matthew 1:22-23. The take-away from Noah’s life is that even someone who pleases God enough for Him to save mankind through him, is capable of ruining that reputation and blowing it in shameful sin. But for God’s grace, that will be us.

The flood brought changes to the world to make it the place it is today. Flood waters came not only from rain, but from the depths of the earth. Parts of the earth broke open to let out water. Our continents were formed as we know them today. Animals now feared man, and rightfully so, because now God gave the animals to man for food and whatever else he could use them for. Death came a lot sooner to man with the atmospheric changes resulting from the flood. These changes brought by the flood are more characteristics of this earth that cause us sorrow, prompting us to wonder if there is a God, or if He is the good God He claims to be. This important lesson from the flood story is that man, not God, is the source of evil in this world. God made it all good; man’s choice ruined what is no longer good.

The real culprit, however, is Satan. It is his influence that causes evil in this world. When man commits evil deeds, he is cooperating with Satan, promoting Satan’s agenda against God, allowing himself to be used by Satan to try to hurt God. May every evil that we witness or by which we are victimized, drive us to God and away from Satan.

Day 1 – Genesis 1 – 4; Psalm 8

There’s so much here that we’ll never cover it all, or even scratch the surface. But a few things I choose to cover this time through:

Did God create? Did He create in a literal six days?
God did not give us an exhaustive account of creation here. Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible, writing with the purpose of documenting the history of the nation of Israel, whose transformation from slavery to conquerors he was attempting to lead. The questions in their minds about origins were much different than ours are. No one in that day doubted that the earth and life are the creations of a transcendently existent, powerful and intelligent God, so Moses didn’t record all the details we would like to have to satisfy the questions raised by modern man. But just because the details aren’t there, doesn’t mean that the Bible’s account of creation is inaccurate.

If you want to know how something happened, you consult eyewitnesses. Who was present to witness creation? Only God. So why wouldn’t we accept His account as authoritative? Man’s wisdom has arrived at accounts of origins of the universe, of life, and of man, based on observations of what is present today: matter and processes he observes today. Science’s theories of origins assume that the processes we observe today have always continued as they are today, which is not necessarily true. In fact, tomorrow’s reading tells about a one-year process that formed much of what we see today. A similar modern-day experience on a smaller scale would be the Mount St. Helens eruption. The processes that they think take millions of years can in a catastrophe take a very short period of time – days, even.

The theories of origins devised by man are inconsistent with the laws of nature, such as the law of entropy, which states that everything goes from a state of order to disorder, unless energy is applied to stop that process of decay. Microbiologists no longer believe in evolution, based on discoveries of how a cell, even a simple cell works. The discoveries about the cell wall itself leave those who know the most about it in awe, unable to believe that it could happen by chance in any amount of time. They believe that a cell is evidence for intelligent design, even if they are not willing to admit that the designer is God.

This story in today’s reading confronts us with a choice: will we choose to believe God, despite what man’s most revered wisdom has devised, or will we risk man’s derision and choose to believe God? If we doubt what God (the only eyewitness) tells us about creation, how trustworthy can we consider His account of man? Of His plan to redeem man; indeed, of the actual need to redeem man? Our choice of whether or not to believe this account of creation has critical consequences for our belief of other truths of which the enemy will want to deceive us. Faith needs to be exercised to believe any account of creation, for none of us were present to witness it; who will you choose to believe, the One who is called faithful and true, or the one who is a deceiver?

What does His creation teach you about God? Creation and God’s method of creation speak to us in different ways. I challenge you to consider this today: what does God’s creation declare to you? For example, a couple observations off the top of my head: That cell wall. If the more man, even a skeptical man, knows about the cell wall alone, drives him in awe to believe in intelligent design, God’s design is truly wonderful. Usually, the more we understand about something, the less amazing it seems. Not so with God’s creation; we will never plunge the depths of understanding He demonstrates in His creation. So it is with all of God’s truth. Secondly, He evaluated His work at the end of each day, and pronounced it good. He took satisfaction in a job well done! I like that about God!

The awfulness of sin.
What’s so awful about eating a piece of fruit, we wonder. God had instructed them not to eat it; they disobeyed God. Eve disobeyed because she found the fruit attractive and because she wanted to be as wise as God. She chose to believe the deceiver’s lie that it would make her as wise as God, rather than consult God about the matter. She attempted to take what she wanted, apart from God’s provision for her, when the denial was actually for her protection. She allowed herself to be used by Satan to hurt God, and allied herself with Satan, doomed to be his pawn. Adam ate because he was influenced by Eve.

The same thing that causes modern man to leave out God from the explanation of where the earth and life came from!

Perhaps we can’t fathom the awfulness of sin because we are in the midst of it, like we can’t see our way through a maze because we are too close to it. In any case, the truth is that sin is awful. If we see it no other way, we see it in its consequences: death. The first taste of this consequence that Adam and Eve had was when God in His mercy provided coverings for their nakedness: He killed an animal. Think of the shock that would have been for Adam and Eve: that animal was doubtless loved by Adam as we love our pets. He named each one! There was no enmity between Adam and any of them, and doubtless they played together like we play with our pets. Think how Adam and Eve grieved over the lifeless body of their dear pet, and how horrible it felt to know that their choice was the cause. Think how repulsed Adam might have been that God could do something so awful, when it wasn’t God’s choice at all; it was man’s choice that brought death. These are all thoughts that are worthy of our contemplation today about our own sin and God’s provision for it.

God’s Promise to Pay Satan Back

In Genesis 3:15 God promises that while Satan will bruise man’s heel, there is a man who will be born one day who will crush Satan’s head. This is God’s announcement that He isn’t giving up on man, that He has a plan to rescue him from Satan’s clutches. Don’t miss this important verse, for it’s what the whole Bible is about!

Is God Good?

Part of sin’s consequence was that the creation was changed. Caring for it would no longer be the delight it had been; it would be toil. Tomorrow’s reading tells us about further changes to creation resulting from man’s sin. God’s creation was something He called “good” over and over again; man’s sin ruined it. So when we see something awful in creation, we are in error to think, “If God is so good, why is this awful thing part of His creation?” Isn’t it scary to realize that sin has consequences beyond the obvious, and that nature suffers for our sin?